Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal
World Senior Teams +65, 2018 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manfred Seibt (1967)
- Black
- Stephan Buchal (2329)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Senior Teams +65
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manfred Seibt (1967) and Stephan Buchal (2329) was played at World Senior Teams +65 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manfred Seibt games or Stephan Buchal games? This Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal?
Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Stephan Buchal.
What opening was played in Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (ECO E83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manfred Seibt vs Stephan Buchal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.