Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman
BL 0910 SV Mlheim Nord - SF Katernberg, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christian, Dr. Seel (2493)
- Black
- Daniel Fridman (2661)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- BL 0910 SV Mlheim Nord - SF Katernberg
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christian, Dr. Seel (2493) and Daniel Fridman (2661) was played at BL 0910 SV Mlheim Nord - SF Katernberg in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christian, Dr. Seel games or Daniel Fridman games? This Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman?
Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Fridman.
What opening was played in Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christian, Dr. Seel vs Daniel Fridman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.