Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida
Arad Open 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikola Sedlak (2586)
- Black
- Mihai-Eugen Bida (2225)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Arad Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikola Sedlak (2586) and Mihai-Eugen Bida (2225) was played at Arad Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikola Sedlak games or Mihai-Eugen Bida games? This Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida?
Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Nikola Sedlak.
What opening was played in Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikola Sedlak vs Mihai-Eugen Bida, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.