Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andrei-Cristian Secrieru (1822)
- Black
- Norbert Kelemen (1652)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andrei-Cristian Secrieru (1822) and Norbert Kelemen (1652) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andrei-Cristian Secrieru games or Norbert Kelemen games? This Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen?
Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andrei-Cristian Secrieru vs Norbert Kelemen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.