Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens
43. Open A Bosna 2013, 2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matej Sebenik (2519)
- Black
- Wim Eveleens (2077)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 43. Open A Bosna 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matej Sebenik (2519) and Wim Eveleens (2077) was played at 43. Open A Bosna 2013 in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matej Sebenik games or Wim Eveleens games? This Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens?
Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matej Sebenik vs Wim Eveleens, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.