Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos
WS/SIM/A/13, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edgar van Seben (2426)
- Black
- Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos (2438)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/SIM/A/13
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edgar van Seben (2426) and Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos (2438) was played at WS/SIM/A/13 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edgar van Seben games or Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos games? This Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos?
Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edgar van Seben vs Pablo Ing Salcedo Mederos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.