David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini
ITA/WMP1/32, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Scuderi (2001)
- Black
- Stefano Lupini (1890)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ITA/WMP1/32
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Scuderi (2001) and Stefano Lupini (1890) was played at ITA/WMP1/32 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Scuderi games or Stefano Lupini games? This David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini?
David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (ECO B77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Scuderi vs Stefano Lupini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.