Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok
BEL Ch Open 2025, 2025 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wouter Schuurbiers (1896)
- Black
- Roel Hamblok (2217)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- BEL Ch Open 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wouter Schuurbiers (1896) and Roel Hamblok (2217) was played at BEL Ch Open 2025 in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wouter Schuurbiers games or Roel Hamblok games? This Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok?
Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Roel Hamblok.
What opening was played in Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wouter Schuurbiers vs Roel Hamblok, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.