Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov
4. Hofheim Spring Open, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (B65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lara Schulze (2079)
- Black
- Daniel Kopylov (2128)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4. Hofheim Spring Open
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (B65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lara Schulze (2079) and Daniel Kopylov (2128) was played at 4. Hofheim Spring Open in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (B65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lara Schulze games or Daniel Kopylov games? This Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov?
Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Kopylov.
What opening was played in Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (ECO B65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lara Schulze vs Daniel Kopylov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.