Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama
2014 · Result 0–1 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rebeca Lot Schucman (1678)
- Black
- Pedro Lourenco Katayama (1975)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rebeca Lot Schucman (1678) and Pedro Lourenco Katayama (1975) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rebeca Lot Schucman games or Pedro Lourenco Katayama games? This Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama?
Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Pedro Lourenco Katayama.
What opening was played in Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rebeca Lot Schucman vs Pedro Lourenco Katayama, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.