Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek
10. LSS Anni P-00012, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Istvan Schrancz (2243)
- Black
- Jaroslav Korinek (1965)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 10. LSS Anni P-00012
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Istvan Schrancz (2243) and Jaroslav Korinek (1965) was played at 10. LSS Anni P-00012 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Istvan Schrancz games or Jaroslav Korinek games? This Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek?
Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Istvan Schrancz.
What opening was played in Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Istvan Schrancz vs Jaroslav Korinek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.