George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett
Varsity Oxford-Cambridge, 1888 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Varsity Oxford-Cambridge
- Year
- 1888
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between George Adolphus Schott and Richard Whieldon Barnett was played at Varsity Oxford-Cambridge in 1888 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more George Adolphus Schott games or Richard Whieldon Barnett games? This George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett?
George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett (1888) finished 0–1, a win for Richard Whieldon Barnett.
What opening was played in George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of George Adolphus Schott vs Richard Whieldon Barnett, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.