Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers
2009 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frank Schoenthier (2322)
- Black
- Alexander Langers (2233)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frank Schoenthier (2322) and Alexander Langers (2233) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frank Schoenthier games or Alexander Langers games? This Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers?
Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Frank Schoenthier.
What opening was played in Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frank Schoenthier vs Alexander Langers, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.