Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz
2016 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adrian Schoeneshoefer (1838)
- Black
- Hans-Juergen Schulz (1935)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adrian Schoeneshoefer (1838) and Hans-Juergen Schulz (1935) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adrian Schoeneshoefer games or Hans-Juergen Schulz games? This Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz?
Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adrian Schoeneshoefer vs Hans-Juergen Schulz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.