Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann
2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oliver Schoembs (1917)
- Black
- Tobias Zimmermann (1804)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oliver Schoembs (1917) and Tobias Zimmermann (1804) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oliver Schoembs games or Tobias Zimmermann games? This Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann?
Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Tobias Zimmermann.
What opening was played in Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oliver Schoembs vs Tobias Zimmermann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.