Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel
2018 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn (1972)
- Black
- Markus Nothnagel (2237)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn (1972) and Markus Nothnagel (2237) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn games or Markus Nothnagel games? This Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel?
Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucas Schoebel-Kroehn vs Markus Nothnagel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.