Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled
CLW II, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (A64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Schoch (2062)
- Black
- Pierre Le Bled (2414)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CLW II
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (A64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Schoch (2062) and Pierre Le Bled (2414) was played at CLW II in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (A64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Schoch games or Pierre Le Bled games? This Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled?
Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense, Main Line (ECO A64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Schoch vs Pierre Le Bled, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.