Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod
date unknown · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edmund Schnur (2187)
- Black
- Peter Weisbrod
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edmund Schnur (2187) and Peter Weisbrod was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edmund Schnur games or Peter Weisbrod games? This Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod?
Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (ECO A33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edmund Schnur vs Peter Weisbrod, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.