Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner
16. Lienz-Open 2011, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gert Schnider (2349)
- Black
- Alfred Bodner (1998)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 16. Lienz-Open 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gert Schnider (2349) and Alfred Bodner (1998) was played at 16. Lienz-Open 2011 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gert Schnider games or Alfred Bodner games? This Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner?
Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Gert Schnider.
What opening was played in Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gert Schnider vs Alfred Bodner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.