Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink
2014 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jens Schmugge (1631)
- Black
- Juergen Meijerink (1965)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jens Schmugge (1631) and Juergen Meijerink (1965) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jens Schmugge games or Juergen Meijerink games? This Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink?
Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Juergen Meijerink.
What opening was played in Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (ECO C59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jens Schmugge vs Juergen Meijerink, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.