Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick
Zurich, 1989 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Albert Schmitter (1839)
- Black
- G. Van Almsick
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zurich
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Albert Schmitter (1839) and G. Van Almsick was played at Zurich in 1989 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Albert Schmitter games or G. Van Almsick games? This Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick?
Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick (1989) finished 1–0, a win for Albert Schmitter.
What opening was played in Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (ECO A97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Albert Schmitter vs G. Van Almsick, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.