Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer
2006 · Result ½–½ · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (D79).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder (1950)
- Black
- Ernst Fatzer (2154)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (D79)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder (1950) and Ernst Fatzer (2154) was played in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (D79). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder games or Ernst Fatzer games? This Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer?
Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-Delayed Exchange Variation (ECO D79).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wolfgang Ernst Schmieder vs Ernst Fatzer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.