Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen
FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_A__000173, 2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jonny Schmidt (1829)
- Black
- Jan Van Mechelen (2276)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_A__000173
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jonny Schmidt (1829) and Jan Van Mechelen (2276) was played at FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_A__000173 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jonny Schmidt games or Jan Van Mechelen games? This Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen?
Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jonny Schmidt.
What opening was played in Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jonny Schmidt vs Jan Van Mechelen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.