Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela
5. LSS CUP Q-00009, 2015 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johannes Schmidt (1639)
- Black
- Zdenek Chmela (1806)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 5. LSS CUP Q-00009
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johannes Schmidt (1639) and Zdenek Chmela (1806) was played at 5. LSS CUP Q-00009 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johannes Schmidt games or Zdenek Chmela games? This Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela?
Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Johannes Schmidt.
What opening was played in Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johannes Schmidt vs Zdenek Chmela, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.