Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt
Muensterland Verbandsliga 0405, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Walter Schmeing (1769)
- Black
- Sebastian Witt (1823)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Muensterland Verbandsliga 0405
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Walter Schmeing (1769) and Sebastian Witt (1823) was played at Muensterland Verbandsliga 0405 in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Walter Schmeing games or Sebastian Witt games? This Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt?
Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Walter Schmeing.
What opening was played in Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Walter Schmeing vs Sebastian Witt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.