Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann
GER Team Ch U16, 2004 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sandro Schloetterlein (1408)
- Black
- Dennis Liedmann (2157)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- GER Team Ch U16
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sandro Schloetterlein (1408) and Dennis Liedmann (2157) was played at GER Team Ch U16 in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sandro Schloetterlein games or Dennis Liedmann games? This Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann?
Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Dennis Liedmann.
What opening was played in Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sandro Schloetterlein vs Dennis Liedmann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.