Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber
2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kai-Friedrich Schlegel (1906)
- Black
- Pascal Neuber (1718)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kai-Friedrich Schlegel (1906) and Pascal Neuber (1718) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kai-Friedrich Schlegel games or Pascal Neuber games? This Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber?
Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Kai-Friedrich Schlegel.
What opening was played in Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kai-Friedrich Schlegel vs Pascal Neuber, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.