Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg
2015 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Schlattmann (1837)
- Black
- Frank Willberg (2019)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Schlattmann (1837) and Frank Willberg (2019) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Schlattmann games or Frank Willberg games? This Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg?
Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Schlattmann vs Frank Willberg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.