Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard
WS/O/949, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Schieferdecker (2081)
- Black
- André Gérard (1789)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/O/949
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Schieferdecker (2081) and André Gérard (1789) was played at WS/O/949 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Schieferdecker games or André Gérard games? This Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard?
Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Martin Schieferdecker.
What opening was played in Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Schieferdecker vs André Gérard, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.