Anton Schermer vs John Temming
date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anton Schermer vs John Temming with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anton Schermer (1819)
- Black
- John Temming
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anton Schermer (1819) and John Temming was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anton Schermer games or John Temming games? This Anton Schermer vs John Temming encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anton Schermer vs John Temming?
Anton Schermer vs John Temming finished 0–1, a win for John Temming.
What opening was played in Anton Schermer vs John Temming?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anton Schermer vs John Temming, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.