Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling
2. Hofheim Spring Open 2014, 2014 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikolas Schenk-Pogan (2286)
- Black
- Hendrik Schulze Ameling (2017)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 2. Hofheim Spring Open 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikolas Schenk-Pogan (2286) and Hendrik Schulze Ameling (2017) was played at 2. Hofheim Spring Open 2014 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikolas Schenk-Pogan games or Hendrik Schulze Ameling games? This Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling?
Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Nikolas Schenk-Pogan.
What opening was played in Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (ECO A87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikolas Schenk-Pogan vs Hendrik Schulze Ameling, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.