Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev
Chelyabinskiy Variant A, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maksim Schekachikhin (2424)
- Black
- Nikita Afanasiev (1559)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Chelyabinskiy Variant A
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maksim Schekachikhin (2424) and Nikita Afanasiev (1559) was played at Chelyabinskiy Variant A in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maksim Schekachikhin games or Nikita Afanasiev games? This Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev?
Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Nikita Afanasiev.
What opening was played in Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maksim Schekachikhin vs Nikita Afanasiev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.