Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger
BdF/Smaragd/07 (GER), 2016 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Norbert Scharf (2220)
- Black
- Irene Neuburger (2050)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- BdF/Smaragd/07 (GER)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Norbert Scharf (2220) and Irene Neuburger (2050) was played at BdF/Smaragd/07 (GER) in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Norbert Scharf games or Irene Neuburger games? This Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger?
Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Irene Neuburger.
What opening was played in Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Norbert Scharf vs Irene Neuburger, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.