Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet
2012 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guillermo Schafer (1808)
- Black
- Sebastian Massanet Massanet (2239)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guillermo Schafer (1808) and Sebastian Massanet Massanet (2239) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guillermo Schafer games or Sebastian Massanet Massanet games? This Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet?
Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Sebastian Massanet Massanet.
What opening was played in Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guillermo Schafer vs Sebastian Massanet Massanet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.