Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena
2015 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (A15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guillermo Schafer (1839)
- Black
- Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena (1480)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (A15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guillermo Schafer (1839) and Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena (1480) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (A15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guillermo Schafer games or Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena games? This Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena?
Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Guillermo Schafer.
What opening was played in Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (ECO A15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guillermo Schafer vs Juan Ignacio Hernandez Pena, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.