Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph
WS/H/262, 2010 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wieslaw Sawicki
- Black
- Donald Randolph (1563)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/H/262
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wieslaw Sawicki and Donald Randolph (1563) was played at WS/H/262 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wieslaw Sawicki games or Donald Randolph games? This Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph?
Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Wieslaw Sawicki.
What opening was played in Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wieslaw Sawicki vs Donald Randolph, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.