Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Leningrad, 1931 · Result 0–1 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonid Savitsky
- Black
- Mikhail Botvinnik (2215)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Leningrad
- Year
- 1931
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonid Savitsky and Mikhail Botvinnik (2215) was played at Leningrad in 1931 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonid Savitsky games or Mikhail Botvinnik games? This Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik?
Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik (1931) finished 0–1, a win for Mikhail Botvinnik.
What opening was played in Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonid Savitsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.