Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev
ch-Siberia, 2008 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandr Saveliev (2284)
- Black
- Vladimir Nevostrujev (2469)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ch-Siberia
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandr Saveliev (2284) and Vladimir Nevostrujev (2469) was played at ch-Siberia in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandr Saveliev games or Vladimir Nevostrujev games? This Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev?
Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Vladimir Nevostrujev.
What opening was played in Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandr Saveliev vs Vladimir Nevostrujev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.