Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov
2013 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladimir Savchuk (1905)
- Black
- Alexey N. Smirnov (2405)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladimir Savchuk (1905) and Alexey N. Smirnov (2405) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladimir Savchuk games or Alexey N. Smirnov games? This Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov?
Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Alexey N. Smirnov.
What opening was played in Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladimir Savchuk vs Alexey N. Smirnov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.