Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura
5. Floripa Open 2019, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Zukertort Opening (A06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Takeshi Sato (1560)
- Black
- Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura (1916)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 5. Floripa Open 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Zukertort Opening (A06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Takeshi Sato (1560) and Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura (1916) was played at 5. Floripa Open 2019 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Zukertort Opening (A06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Takeshi Sato games or Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura games? This Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Zukertort Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura?
Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Claudio Takeshi Sato.
What opening was played in Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura?
The game opened with the Zukertort Opening (ECO A06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Takeshi Sato vs Paulo Jorge Alves B. Moura, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.