Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto
2017 · Result 1–0 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Angel Sarto Ramos (1897)
- Black
- Jesus Brosa Soto (1965)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Angel Sarto Ramos (1897) and Jesus Brosa Soto (1965) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Angel Sarto Ramos games or Jesus Brosa Soto games? This Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto?
Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Angel Sarto Ramos.
What opening was played in Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Angel Sarto Ramos vs Jesus Brosa Soto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.