Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter
39. Eastman Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jelle Sarrau (2373)
- Black
- Theo De Putter (1856)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 39. Eastman Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jelle Sarrau (2373) and Theo De Putter (1856) was played at 39. Eastman Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jelle Sarrau games or Theo De Putter games? This Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter?
Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jelle Sarrau.
What opening was played in Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (ECO D19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jelle Sarrau vs Theo De Putter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.