Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron
2012 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julio Sarmiento (1962)
- Black
- Joel Ibarra Padron (2158)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julio Sarmiento (1962) and Joel Ibarra Padron (2158) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julio Sarmiento games or Joel Ibarra Padron games? This Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron?
Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julio Sarmiento vs Joel Ibarra Padron, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.