Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita
2018 · Result ½–½ · Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1876)
- Black
- Arnaldo Leite Mesquita (1742)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1876) and Arnaldo Leite Mesquita (1742) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva games or Arnaldo Leite Mesquita games? This Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita?
Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (ECO A52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Arnaldo Leite Mesquita, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.