Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho
2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1951)
- Black
- Jose Jorge De Carvalho (2231)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1951) and Jose Jorge De Carvalho (2231) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva games or Jose Jorge De Carvalho games? This Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho?
Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Jorge De Carvalho.
What opening was played in Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva vs Jose Jorge De Carvalho, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.