Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza
2009 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Larsen Attack (A01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro (2136)
- Black
- David Castellanos Mendoza (1986)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack (A01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro (2136) and David Castellanos Mendoza (1986) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Larsen Attack (A01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro games or David Castellanos Mendoza games? This Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Larsen Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza?
Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro.
What opening was played in Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack (ECO A01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Miguel Saraiva Ribeiro vs David Castellanos Mendoza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.