Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano
2011 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Otavio Belegarde dos Santos (1830)
- Black
- Nilo Feliciano (2022)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Otavio Belegarde dos Santos (1830) and Nilo Feliciano (2022) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Otavio Belegarde dos Santos games or Nilo Feliciano games? This Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano?
Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Otavio Belegarde dos Santos vs Nilo Feliciano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.