Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo
2012 · Result ½–½ · Modern Defense (B06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Natalia Andrea Santos Morales (2017)
- Black
- Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo (1755)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Modern Defense (B06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Natalia Andrea Santos Morales (2017) and Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo (1755) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Modern Defense (B06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Natalia Andrea Santos Morales games or Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo games? This Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo?
Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo?
The game opened with the Modern Defense (ECO B06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Natalia Andrea Santos Morales vs Harrie Tulio Geurts Morillo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.