Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov
19. ch-EUR Indiv 2018, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Santos Latasa (2549)
- Black
- Rauf Mamedov (2709)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 19. ch-EUR Indiv 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Santos Latasa (2549) and Rauf Mamedov (2709) was played at 19. ch-EUR Indiv 2018 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Santos Latasa games or Rauf Mamedov games? This Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov?
Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Rauf Mamedov.
What opening was played in Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Santos Latasa vs Rauf Mamedov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.