Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani
70. ch-ITA S/F, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Flank Variation (B87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Domenico Santeramo (1884)
- Black
- Roberto Cardani (1998)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 70. ch-ITA S/F
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Flank Variation (B87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Domenico Santeramo (1884) and Roberto Cardani (1998) was played at 70. ch-ITA S/F in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Flank Variation (B87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Domenico Santeramo games or Roberto Cardani games? This Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Flank Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani?
Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Domenico Santeramo.
What opening was played in Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Flank Variation (ECO B87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Domenico Santeramo vs Roberto Cardani, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.